candidate sched.h and sys/sched.h for review

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 03/31/2010 06:39 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On 03/31/2010 11:31 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 03/31/2010 06:22 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>> On 03/31/2010 10:08 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>> On 03/31/2010 04:54 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>>> Next try.  I am starting a build with this now so there
>>>>> might be problems.
>>>>>
>>>>> Corinna.. SCHED_SPORADIC is now 4. My concern is
>>>>> with these constants is that they are sometimes used
>>>>> in language bindings and we would have to propagate that.
>>>>> If you don't mind, once this rework is in, I will address
>>>>> getting us in sync on the other values.
>>>>>
>>>>> How does it look now?
>>>> Errm, I don't think so:
>>>>
>>>> * Shouldn't sched.h include sys/sched.h?
>>>> * Why does sys/sched.h exist at all?
>>>>      Shouldn't it better be merged into sched.h?
>>> newlib is rather contorted here but I think it
>>> gets the job done.
>>>
>>> sched.h includes sys/types.h (which defines timespec)
>>>
>> SUSv4 mandates timespec in<time.h>  and sys/sched.h to receive it from
>> <time.h>.
>>
> Do you mean sched.h?
Yes, sorry.

Ralf