[RFA] More aggressive use of atexit locking

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Feb  1 21:10, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> It seems like we should be locking both the feeder and the emptier for
> atexit operations shouldn't we?  Otherwise one can be deleting things
> while another is adding things.  This is especially important for the
> __cxa_* functions since the emptier can be called at any time, not just
> on process exit.

Yeah, this seems like the right thing to do.  The patch looks good to me.

> Ok to commit?

Jeff?  Hello?  Did you have any chance to look into this patch, as well
as the patch in http://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2010/msg00050.html?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
Red Hat