[RFA] More aggressive use of atexit locking
Thu Feb 4 16:55:00 GMT 2010
On Feb 1 21:10, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> It seems like we should be locking both the feeder and the emptier for
> atexit operations shouldn't we? Otherwise one can be deleting things
> while another is adding things. This is especially important for the
> __cxa_* functions since the emptier can be called at any time, not just
> on process exit.
Yeah, this seems like the right thing to do. The patch looks good to me.
> Ok to commit?
Jeff? Hello? Did you have any chance to look into this patch, as well
as the patch in http://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2010/msg00050.html?
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
More information about the Newlib