NO_REENT?

[Jeff Johnston]

It is an oversight that got copied around.  Patch applied.

Thanks,

-- Jeff J.

On 01/12/09 10:34 AM, Howland Craig D (Craig) wrote:
> Does anybody know why strtod.c, dtoastub.c, and wcstod.c use "NO_REENT"
> to gate the not-directly-reentrant versions of their functions instead
> of the "_REENT_ONLY" that is used everywhere else?  I would think that
> it is a mistake that has gone un-noticed, and have attached a patch
> that fixes it in the case that it is.
> Craig
>
>
> e.g.
> $ tail -21 strtod.c
> #ifndef NO_REENT
>
> double
> _DEFUN (strtod, (s00, se),
>          _CONST char *s00 _AND char **se)
> {
>    return _strtod_r (_REENT, s00, se);
> }
>
> float
> _DEFUN (strtof, (s00, se),
>          _CONST char *s00 _AND
>          char **se)
> {
>    double retval = _strtod_r (_REENT, s00, se);
>    if (isnan (retval))
>      return nanf (NULL);
>    return (float)retval;
> }
>
> #endif
> $ tail -12 strtol.c
> #ifndef _REENT_ONLY
>
> long
> _DEFUN (strtol, (s, ptr, base),
>          _CONST char *s _AND
>          char **ptr _AND
>          int base)
> {
>          return _strtol_r (_REENT, s, ptr, base);
> }
>
> #endif