[patch,rtems] Don't build __assert_func for RTEMS

[Jeff Johnston]

On 22/09/09 05:45 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> On 21/09/09 11:36 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> another RTEMS patch.
>>
>> RTEMS has a version of __assert_func of its own outside of newlib and
>> therefore doesn't need newlib's __assert_func.
>>
>> Ralf
>>
>>
>
> I would like to modify this to use a generic flag rather than a check
> for __rtems. I really want to change all the various OS and platform
> checks we have in shared headers/code and replace them with more
> generic-usage ones (Cygwin and rtems are the most prevalent).
>
> In this case, I would like to suggest either HAVE___ASSERT_FUNC or
> _EXTERNAL_ASSERT_FUNC (or feel free to come up with a better one).
>
> I can make the change myself and add the flag to the rtems set in
> configure.host if you are ok with any particular flag choice.
>
> -- Jeff J.

I went with HAVE_ASSERT_FUNC.  Patch using this flag has been checked in.

-- Jeff J.