Tue Jan 20 18:55:00 GMT 2009
Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> As code shared by GCC and glibc I would suggest the same license notice as
>> soft-fp (LGPL >= 2.1 + exception) to allow an identical file to be shared.
>> (Indeed, soft-fp uses this header.) The version in GMP diverged long ago
>> so sharing the file with that may not be feasible.
> I have suggested this change to the SC.
The FSF has approved the change. Joseph, would you please update the
license notice on the file to match soft-fp? Please update any active
branches with the problem as well to avoid confusion for anyone working
from those branches.
(650) 331-3385 x713
More information about the Newlib