New libtool is in the GCC and Src trees.

[Mike Stump]

On May 24, 2007, at 2:14 PM, libtool@cwilson.fastmail.fm wrote:
> Instead of fixing gcc's local copy, shouldn't this fix -- or a  
> better one -- instead be submitted to libtool, and then gcc can  
> resync?  (At least in the medium-to-long term.  For an immediate  
> and temporary fix for a broken build, as long as it IS temporary...)

I agree.  I'm happy to have the hack in gcc so that we don't have gcc  
not building and testing for the next month, but really, those  
options should work on the compiler.  If someone is passing them to  
the linker, well, that's wrong.  If to the compiler, I don't quite  
see what went wrong, and no one said what went wrong.  Cleaverly, I  
was waiting on other recent breakages to go away before updating, so  
I didn't see what went wrong.