[PATCH] Fix _SC_xxx and _POSIX_xxx definitions
Jeff Johnston
jjohnstn@redhat.com
Wed Feb 7 04:32:00 GMT 2007
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 6 17:32, Jeff Johnston wrote:
>> What happened to the __rtems__ checks around _SC_STREAM_MAX and
>> _SC_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING? Are these or additional RTEMS checks needed?
>> [...]
>>> It's especially noteworthy
>>> that SUSv3 does not allow to omit any one of the _SC_xxx definitions.
>
> I thought this explains it. See the description of unistd.h in the
> SUSv3 man pages.
>
Neither of us speaks for RTEMS. What I am wondering is if the value is
defined already in RTEMS and possibly already has a different value.
That's why I asked and also cc'd Joel.
-- Jeff
More information about the Newlib
mailing list