[PATCH] Fix _SC_xxx and _POSIX_xxx definitions

Jeff Johnston jjohnstn@redhat.com
Wed Feb 7 04:32:00 GMT 2007


Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb  6 17:32, Jeff Johnston wrote:
>> What happened to the __rtems__ checks around _SC_STREAM_MAX and 
>> _SC_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING?  Are these or additional RTEMS checks needed?
>> [...]
>>>  It's especially noteworthy
>>> that SUSv3 does not allow to omit any one of the _SC_xxx definitions.
> 
> I thought this explains it.  See the description of unistd.h in the
> SUSv3 man pages.
>

Neither of us speaks for RTEMS.  What I am wondering is if the value is 
defined already in RTEMS and possibly already has a different value. 
That's why I asked and also cc'd Joel.

-- Jeff



More information about the Newlib mailing list