PATCH: ARMV7M support
Jeff Johnston
jjohnstn@redhat.com
Fri Mar 24 10:16:00 GMT 2006
Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Shaun Jackman wrote:
>
>
>>Can you seperate the bare-metal and dependency (_exit and stdio)
>>component from the ARMv7M componenet of the patch? Non-ARMv7M targets
>>also benefit from your bare-metal/dependency work. I found the patch
>>difficult to read with the two matters mixed.
>
>
> The dependency work (_exit.c, avoiding initialise_monitor_handles) is
> actually already independent of ARM V7M; those changes apply to all ARM
> configurations. I could break the patch apart to make that more
> obvious, if necessary.
>
> However, you are correct that non-ARMV7M targets could benefit from the
> option not to make semihosting calls in crt0.o. I can easily add a
> separate #ifdef for that.
>
You might as well make this change when you resubmit for Shaun.
> (If acceptance of this patch is contingent on converting newlib to use
> libgloss for ARM, I may not get to it very quickly. It's not that I
> don't agree that it's a good thing to do; it's just that I don't have
> time to do it right now. I will still get to it, but not for a week or
> two. This isn't meant to pressure for acceptance, it's just FYI.)
>
No, it is not contingent, but I trust you will do your best to get
around to it; otherwise I have to do it. I'll look at why the sources
aren't currently in sync regarding changes that apply to both.
> Thanks,
>
More information about the Newlib
mailing list