Tue Sep 20 04:25:00 GMT 2005
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 04:47:27AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 22:11 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I really don't see any need to use the RTEMS stuff especially given the
>>"it's not broke" principle.
>Well, the RTEMS stdint.h/inttypes.h aren't specific to RTEMS.
Again, since there is nothing wrong with the present cygwin
implementation, there is no reason to change what we have.
More information about the Newlib