libgloss/arm/libcfunc.c: alarm [PATCH]

[Shaun Jackman]

Ping?

I feel that stubs should not be linked in by default and silently, and
should not be provided in the same object file as useful functions.
Should the alarm(2) stub be removed from libgloss/arm/libcfunc.c?

Cheers,
Shaun

On 5/19/05, Shaun Jackman <sjackman@gmail.com> wrote:
> The definition of alarm in libgloss/arm/libcfunc.c is a stub, but
> overriding the alarm stub also required overriding abort, which is not
> a stub but a useful function.
> 
> In this patch I've moved it to libnosys. Although, libnosys has only
> been used for system call (i.e. underscore prefixed) functions, so I'm
> not sure this is the best home. Perhaps a new library, libstubs, would
> be useful for these sort of non-syscall stub functions.
> 
> Cheers,
> Shaun
> 
> 2005-05-19  Shaun Jackman  <sjackman@gmail.com>
> 
>         * libgloss/arm/libcfunc.c (alarm): Remove.
>         * libgloss/libnosys/alarm.c: New file.
> 
> --- libgloss/arm/libcfunc.c-    2004-06-09 12:06:50.000000000 -0700
> +++ libgloss/arm/libcfunc.c     2005-05-19 14:02:01.000000000 -0700
> @@ -33,8 +33,3 @@
>   asm ("mov r0,#17\nswi %a0" :: "i" (SWI_Exit));
>   #endif
>  }
> -
> -void
> -alarm (void)
> -{
> -}
> --- /dev/null   2005-05-18 14:50:21.000000000 -0700
> +++ libgloss/libnosys/alarm.c     2005-05-19 14:05:56.000000000 -0700
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +/*
> + * Stub version of alarm.
> + */
> +
> +#include "config.h"
> +#include "warning.h"
> +
> +void
> +alarm (void)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +stub_warning (alarm)
>