Useful function declarations
Jeff Johnston
jjohnstn@redhat.com
Mon Mar 7 00:12:00 GMT 2005
Shaun Jackman wrote:
>>Ok. Are you willing to put together a patch? My preference would be a
>>symbol that is unlikely to be used by something else like gcc (e.g..
>>prefix with __newlib_). If optional, it should be put in the newlib.h
>>header file.
>
>
> I'd be happy to put the patch together. I'd already started doing this
> using __ARM_ARCH_4T__ -- just because the symbol was handy -- so I'll
> just fix up the patch to use a more appropriate symbol. My inclination
> is to use __newilb_susv3.
>
Sounds reasonable with typo fixed :)
> Cheers,
> Shaun
More information about the Newlib
mailing list