Fw: Applying CRX port to Newlib project
jjohnstn
jjohnstn@redhat.com
Sat Oct 2 03:32:00 GMT 2004
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Tomer Levi wrote:
Thanks Tomer,
Looks fine.
-- Jeff J.
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thanks for the explanation.
> In order to close this issue in a good spirit, I'm attaching a file,
> containing the template that will be included in each and every CRX file.
> Once i finish doing all these modifications, i will send you a new CRX
> patch for Newlib.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Tomer Levi
>
> Software Engineer phone:
> +49-8141-35-1378
> CompactRISC Development Tools fax: +49-8141-35-11-1378
> National Semiconductor GmbH mailto:Tomer.Levi@nsc.com
> Livry-Gargan Str. 10 internet:
> http://www.national.com
> 82256 Fuerstenfeldbruck, Germany
>
>
>
>
>
> "Jeff Johnston" <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
> Sent by: newlib-owner@sources.redhat.com
> 09/30/2004 05:49 PM
>
> To: "Tomer Levi" <Tomer.Levi@nsc.com>
> cc: "Ralf Corsepius" <ralf_corsepius@rtems.org>, "Newlib List"
> <newlib@sources.redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: Fw: Applying CRX port to Newlib project
>
>
> Tomer Levi wrote:
> > Hi Ralf,
> >
> > If you look at other architectures, such as iq2000 or i960, you will
> > notice that all their files doesn't contain a copyright nor licensing.
> > So, can you explain the status of these ports ?
>
> These are written by Cygnus which is now Red Hat. If you look at the end
> of
> COPYING.NEWLIB, you will see that:
>
> ====================================================================
> Unless otherwise stated in each remaining newlib file, the remaining
> files in the newlib subdirectory default to the following copyright.
> It should be noted that Red Hat Incorporated now owns copyrights
> belonging to Cygnus Solutions and Cygnus Support.
>
> .....
> ====================================================================
>
> Seeing as we didn't write your new files - this clause shouldn't trigger
> in this
> case.
>
> -- Jeff J.
>
>
>
> I just thought to adapt
> > this solution to CRX port.
> > If this is not acceptable by you, i can add licensing message in the
> same
> > format as in
> > other ports files ("The authors hereby grant permission to use...").
> >
> > If one of these options is preferable, please respond quickly and i will
>
> > send a new patch.
> > Thanks for your guidance.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tomer Levi
> >
> > Software Engineer phone:
> > +49-8141-35-1378
> > CompactRISC Development Tools fax: +49-8141-35-11-1378
> > National Semiconductor GmbH mailto:Tomer.Levi@nsc.com
> > Livry-Gargan Str. 10 internet:
> > http://www.national.com
> > 82256 Fuerstenfeldbruck, Germany
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Ralf Corsepius" <ralf_corsepius@rtems.org>
> > Sent by: newlib-owner@sources.redhat.com
> > 09/30/2004 10:14 AM
> >
> > To: "Newlib List" <newlib@sources.redhat.com>
> > cc:
> > Subject: Re: Applying CRX port to Newlib project
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 11:18, Tomer Levi wrote:
> >
> >>Hi Jeff,
> >>
> >>Jeff Johnston wrote :
> >
> >
> >>Jeff Johnston wrote :
> >>
> >>> 1. You have no licensing in your files, just a copyright.
> >>> You should talk to your employer to see what is acceptable.
> >>> Newlib prefers BSD-compatible or freer. GPL or proprietary code
> >
> > is
> >
> >>> not accepted.
> >
> >
> >>Is it agreeable to remove all 'National Semiconductor Corporation'
> >>copyright from headers of CRX files, as a solution for this legal issue
> >
> > ?
> >
> > You seem to be mixing up copyright with license. These are different
> > things.
> >
> > * A copyright notice denotes a party claiming "mental ownership" on
> > something ("Copyright NSC" means: "We, NSC are the original authors").
> > * A license denotes the rights the copyright owner gives away to others.
> >
> > Some (many) of your files don't carry license terms, so it is not
> > obvious and clear, if newlib and newlib's users are legitimated to use
> > and modify these files.
> >
> > Ralf
> >
> >
>
>
>
More information about the Newlib
mailing list