[PATCH] Fix ColdFire support for GCC 3.4 in libgloss
Wed Oct 15 19:41:00 GMT 2003
J. Johnston wrote:
> I'm afraid I can't accept this change as-is. The problem is that gcc
> code is under the GPL license and newlib does not accept GPL licensed
> contributions. If you want to make your own set of macros based on your
> "observations of gcc" or if you were to copy from a BSD-licensed source,
> that would be fine, but to copy the macros (plus/minus comments)
> directly from the gcc code is not.
This isn't a problem: I'm the author of those changes in GCC,
and my FSF copyright assignment papers grant me full ownership
of my contributions.
I hereby re-license my code to the newlib project with the same
license of libgloss/m68k/crt0.S.
> I would also like to see any such replacement macros placed into a
> header file included by the two files rather than copied multiple times.
Sure. I'll resubmit the patch moving the definitions to asm.h.
// Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
Please don't send Word attachments - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
More information about the Newlib