sscanf behaviour. bug?

[Hannes Krueger]

The following is from a recent thread on comp.lang.c
and seems to be a bug in the sscanf implementation of newlib, since cygwin (with
which this behaviour occurs) is using newlib.
I had a look in the newlib-sources, but I wasnt able to locate this problem.
Maybe someone else is able to?!

regards
Hannes

the following is copied from the newsgroup:

---

In <3e703aa8$1@sia.uibk.ac.at> student <student@dont.like.spam> writes:


>>I encountered some strange sscanf-behaviour.
>>
>>this is the line I want to parse:
>>B0927035313520....
>>
>>I want to read fixed columns.
>>
>>sscanf(line, "%*c%2lf%2lf%2lf ...." , &val1, &val2, &val3 ....
>>
>>when I compile in a linux gnu environment I get
>>val1 = 9
>>val2 = 27
>>val3 = 3


This is the correct behaviour.  %f (or any other conversion descriptor,
for that matter) does not allow the suppression of zeros before the
start of the conversion.


>>But when I compile under cygwin (gcc 3.2) on windows I get
>>val1 = 92
>>val2 = 70
>>val3 = 35


This is broken behaviour.  You have specified a *maximum* field length
of 2, but the first conversion used 3 characters.


>>It seems that the second one omits the zeros 
>>
>>Is this some weird gnu - non-gnu diffence? something I missed in the 
>>documentation.
>>Any suggestions what to do aboout that?


Get a non-broken implementation.  If this is not an option, use %2s
instead and convert the strings to double with 
(val[0] - '0') * 10.0 + val[1] - '0'.

If needed, you can also check the validity of the strings with 
isdigit((unsigned char)val[0]) && isdigit((unsigned char)val[1])

Dan
--
Dan Pop
DESY Zeuthen, RZ group
Email: Dan.Pop@ifh.de