the remaining chunk of the RTEMS patch
Tue Dec 12 06:34:00 GMT 2000
On Tuesday 12 December 2000 14:02, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > AFAICT, it removes things like '_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF' and
> > '_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN'. It also seems to renumber other SC_
> > constants from their previous usage, which breaks backwards
> > compatibility.
> Where were these? I thought I did not remove any. :(
As usual: libc/include/sys/unistd.h
> Also AFAIK aren't these beyond POSIX?
So they have to be removed?
> As I have stated other times, RTEMS does not particularly care about
> the numeric values. Feel free to change them to whatever Cygwin
I'm somewhat annoyed by this statement. Why didn't you care
for the values when creating the patch? I'm not quite convinced
that other people have to repair the damage but you.
> Please feel free to change the value of constants. RTEMS does not
> on these in any fashion. :)
Then, why did you change the existing values?
Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the Newlib