Status of RTEMS Patches
Joel Sherrill
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com
Thu Dec 7 06:58:00 GMT 2000
"J. Johnston" wrote:
>
> Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> > My notes show that of the recent batch of RTEMS patches, the
> > following have not had any response:
> >
> > stmp-targ-include modification
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/newlib/2000/msg00410.html
> >
> > the remaining chunk of the RTEMS patch
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/newlib/2000/msg00414.html
> >
> > [I know this one is big and will take some time to
> > digest. I just did not want it to fall between the cracks.]
> >
> > The vfprintf.c one has generated discussion and there is
> > no agreement as to whether it is proper or not.
> >
>
> No, they have not fallen through the cracks. I am just backed up with
> other work including finalizing two other patches (long double I/O support) and Linux.
I thought the "remaining chunk" would take time to evaluate.
This was just a status summary more than anything else. No
accusation of slacking. <grin>
Please feel free to ask questions about the remaining chunk.
I tried to be minimally invasive while adding some infrastructure
for feature flags.
> I am almost ready to check in your remaining chunk patch.
>
> The vfprintf.c patch will be checked in later today.
Great. Once the gcc patches I submitted are in, there should
be no rtems specific patch for binutils, gcc, or newlib. :)
> -- Jeff J.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
More information about the Newlib
mailing list