Problem with snprintf()
Wed Aug 9 00:07:00 GMT 2000
Wednesday, 09 August, 2000 Chris Faylor email@example.com wrote:
>>>So snprintf() should always add a terminating \0.
>>And snprintf() may return -1 only in case of encoding error, not if the
>>string exceeds `size'. So that is answered as well, IMO.
CF> So, have we come up with a patch for this behavior?
i've posted one in http://sources.redhat.com/ml/newlib/2000/msg00183.html
i believe it'll make (v)snprintf C99-compliant
if there're no objections, will somebody kindly check it in?
Egor. mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19
More information about the Newlib