libiberty patch - configure/makefile for cygwin

Jeffrey A Law
Fri Aug 4 16:06:00 GMT 2000

  In message < >you write:
  > > So ultimately, after Alexandre's recent hackery, what is the right
  > > thing to do to get cygwin builds working again independently of gcc?
  > This patch should mean "if we're also building gcc, and it's a gcc
  > that will run on the build machine, we want to use its includes
  > instead of the system's default includes".  Right?

  > Otherwise, the target libiberty's Makefile now includes -I's for
  > newlib, so that's fixed.


More information about the Newlib mailing list