memcpy performance (fwd)
Jonathan Larmour
jlarmour@cygnus.co.uk
Tue Dec 9 12:02:00 GMT 1997
Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> I thought I would pass this on. Does the new version of memcpy do much
> better than this?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 97 12:03:28 -0600
> From: Eric Norum <eric@skatter.USask.Ca>
> To: rtems-list@oarcorp.com
> Subject: Re: memcpy performance
>
> It's even worse than just a byte-by-byte copy!
>
> On the 971024 snapshot (gen68360 BSP) a call to memcpy produces:
[...a lot of unnecessary wastefulness]
Is he compiling with -O? If so, then gcc should include its own builtin
memcpy instead of the newlib one AIUI.
This may not be true for that target possibly. Anyone know?
Jonathan L.
More information about the Newlib
mailing list