[From nobody Mon Nov 29 07:08:25 2021 Return-path: <mauve-patches@sourceware.org> Received: from omr15.orchid.atmailcloud.com ([13.251.197.89]) by www10.cpt1.host-h.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mauve-patches@sourceware.org>) id 1mradN-0007AT-VQ for jamie@tiam.co.za; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 08:59:34 +0200 Received: from MRR.i-0faca4c6781e4107f by OMR.i-071a692e52084b6df with esmtps (envelope-from <mauve-patches@sourceware.org>) id 1mracr-0001Fd-4Y; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:58:57 +0800 Received: from CMR.i-0230dfc5f1213b349 by MRR.i-0faca4c6781e4107f with esmtps (envelope-from <mauve-patches@sourceware.org>) id 1mracq-0001Mr-QD; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:58:56 +0800 Received: from [203.125.107.34] (helo=DCRBCJ23.shengsheng.local) by CMR.i-0230dfc5f1213b349 with esmtp (envelope-from <mauve-patches@sourceware.org>) id 1mrack-0002ZW-Jj; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:58:54 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: WARM REGARDS To: Recipients <mauve-patches@sourceware.org> From: "BEN JOHNSON" <mauve-patches@sourceware.org> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:55:44 +0800 Reply-To: bjattorneys5@gmail.com X-Atmail-Id: mauve-patches@sourceware.org X-atmailcloud-spam-score: 1000 X-atmailcloud-spam-bar: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ X-atmailcloud-spam-action: reject X-Virus-Scanned: Clear X-Unfudged-Spam-Flag: YES X-Unfudged-Spam-Report: spam_server=spamd2.cpt1.host-h.net Spam detection software, running on the system "spamd2.cpt1.host-h.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, please contact your email administrator. Content analysis details: (13.2 points, 5 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------------- 0.0 JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL ASKDNS: SPF set to ?all [sourceware.org TXT:v=spf1 a mx] [?all] 2.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100% [score: 1.0000] 0.2 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100% [score: 1.0000] 0.2 RELAYCOUNTRY_BAD_US Relayed through the US 0.5 FROM_NOT_REPLYTO From does not match Reply-To 0.0 FROM_IS_TO From and To is the same 0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in digit (bjattorneys5[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) 1.0 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals 0.5 FROM_NOT_REPLYTO_SAME_DOMAIN From domain does not match Reply-To domain 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.3 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL RBL: Relay in Validity RPBL, https://senderscore.org/blocklistlookup/ [13.251.197.89 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 4.0 PYZOR_CHECK Listed in Pyzor (https://pyzor.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) 0.2 KAM_DMARC_NONE DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message and the domain has no DMARC policy 0.5 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header 0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment 0.2 H_FSL_BULK_SIG Bulk signature with no Unsubscribe 2.1 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: Mail message body Good Day, An exhaustive and meticulous search was conducted and it is in connection = with this search that I'm writing to you today base on your surname which y= ou share with a client that is now deceased. Revert back to me for more det= ails to be given to you. = Sincerely, Barr Ben Johnson ]