From robilad@yahoo.com Mon Oct 1 17:39:00 2001 From: robilad@yahoo.com (Dalibor Topic) Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 17:39:00 -0000 Subject: Adding serialized version uid tests to mauve Message-ID: <20011118224422.62257.qmail@web10005.mail.yahoo.com> Hi, I'm thinking about contributing serial version UID tests to mauve, which would test whether a class has the proper serial version uid. Is there any desire for such tests in mauve? Actually, is there some written "Contributing" and "Hacking Mauve" documentation available? I found the contributing section on the web page to be, well, blank, and the documentation in the CVS wasn't that helpful on the topic either. bye, Dalibor Topic ===== "Success means never having to wear a suit" __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com From cbj@gnu.org Mon Oct 1 18:18:00 2001 From: cbj@gnu.org (Brian Jones) Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 18:18:00 -0000 Subject: Adding serialized version uid tests to mauve In-Reply-To: Dalibor Topic's message of "Sun, 18 Nov 2001 14:44:22 -0800 (PST)" References: <20011118224422.62257.qmail@web10005.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Dalibor Topic writes: > Hi, > > I'm thinking about contributing serial version UID > tests to mauve, which would test whether a class has > the proper serial version uid. Is there any desire for > such tests in mauve? It is possible that Japize serves these needs. See http://stuart.wuffies.net/japi/ > Actually, is there some written "Contributing" and > "Hacking Mauve" documentation available? I found the > contributing section on the web page to be, well, > blank, and the documentation in the CVS wasn't that > helpful on the topic either. The README has the necessary information, although I too find that figuring out how to use it is not so obvious. You must set variables before running configure. If you change them, rerun configure. JAVA Name of Java interpreter to use JAVAC Name of Java (to class) compiler to use I use the following values for ORP & Classpath JAVA=~/orp-1.0.8/mains/orp/Linux/dbg/orp -classpath /usr/local/classpath/share/classpath:. (Umm, 1.0.8 doesn't work for me yet btw so don't expect much if you try that!) JAVAC=jikes Some classes in Mauve apparently have a method (non-constructor) of the same name as the class and Jikes doesn't like those, the rest seem okay. Here's the hard part. The readme talks about using KEYS=... and here is the only way I've tried that works. cd mauve make KEYS=classpath check In the "mauve" directory I've placed a file called "mauve-classpath" with entries like this. A version of this file is checked into Classpath's CVS and gcj has a similar file in its CVS tree. JDK1.0 JDK1.1 #JDK1.2 #JDBC2.0 !java.applet !java.awt !java.beans !java.beans.DescriptorTest !java.beans.IntrospectorTest Brian -- Brian Jones From tromey@redhat.com Mon Oct 1 18:57:00 2001 From: tromey@redhat.com (Tom Tromey) Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 18:57:00 -0000 Subject: Adding serialized version uid tests to mauve In-Reply-To: Dalibor Topic's message of "Sun, 18 Nov 2001 14:44:22 -0800 (PST)" References: <20011118224422.62257.qmail@web10005.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <873d3b2okx.fsf@creche.redhat.com> >>>>> "Dalibor" == Dalibor Topic writes: Dalibor> I'm thinking about contributing serial version UID tests to Dalibor> mauve, which would test whether a class has the proper serial Dalibor> version uid. Is there any desire for such tests in mauve? I think it would be useful. Even more useful would be something to make sure that the actual serialization is interoperable: make sure some test platform can interoperate with the JDK. This would probably require a new test platform; the current one can't really do something like this. Dalibor> Actually, is there some written "Contributing" and "Hacking Dalibor> Mauve" documentation available? I found the contributing Dalibor> section on the web page to be, well, blank, and the Dalibor> documentation in the CVS wasn't that helpful on the topic Dalibor> either. There's the README, but that's about it. The build setup is a bit dumb, really. I've occasionally considered moving the key selection from `make' to `configure', since that is imho easier to understand. However my Mauve hacking time is essentially nil. Tom From tromey@redhat.com Tue Oct 2 01:14:00 2001 From: tromey@redhat.com (Tom Tromey) Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 01:14:00 -0000 Subject: Adding serialized version uid tests to mauve In-Reply-To: Brian Jones's message of "18 Nov 2001 23:12:10 -0500" References: <20011118224422.62257.qmail@web10005.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <87zo5j19xw.fsf@creche.redhat.com> >>>>> "Brian" == Brian Jones writes: Brian> Some classes in Mauve apparently have a method Brian> (non-constructor) of the same name as the class and Jikes Brian> doesn't like those, the rest seem okay. These are definitely bugs. Feel free to check in fixes. Or send me a list and I'll put it on my to-do list. Brian> Here's the hard part. The readme talks about using Brian> KEYS=... and here is the only way I've tried that works. Brian> cd mauve Brian> make KEYS=classpath check Yeah, that's what you're supposed to do. Yucky. Tom From edwardribeiro@yahoo.com Tue Oct 2 16:27:00 2001 From: edwardribeiro@yahoo.com (Edward Ribeiro) Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 16:27:00 -0000 Subject: unsubscribe mauve-discuss Message-ID: <20011119141340.8390.qmail@web13406.mail.yahoo.com> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com From apbianco@cygnus.com Tue Oct 2 16:31:00 2001 From: apbianco@cygnus.com (Alexandre Petit-Bianco) Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 16:31:00 -0000 Subject: unsubscribe mauve-discuss In-Reply-To: <20011119141340.8390.qmail@web13406.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20011119141340.8390.qmail@web13406.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <15353.11461.825077.384479@fencer.cygnus.com> Edward Ribeiro writes: > ... In order to unsubscribe, please send a message to mauve-discuss-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com ./A From robilad@yahoo.com Tue Oct 2 19:43:00 2001 From: robilad@yahoo.com (Dalibor Topic) Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 19:43:00 -0000 Subject: Adding serialized version uid tests to mauve In-Reply-To: <873d3b2okx.fsf@creche.redhat.com> Message-ID: <20011120205912.79886.qmail@web10002.mail.yahoo.com> --- Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Dalibor" == Dalibor Topic > writes: > > Dalibor> I'm thinking about contributing serial > version UID tests to > Dalibor> mauve, which would test whether a class has > the proper serial > Dalibor> version uid. Is there any desire for such > tests in mauve? > > I think it would be useful. Even more useful would > be something to > make sure that the actual serialization is > interoperable: make sure > some test platform can interoperate with the JDK. > This would probably > require a new test platform; the current one can't > really do something > like this. Could you elaborate some more on the interoperability issues involved? Dalibor Topic ===== "Success means never having to wear a suit" __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1 From robilad@yahoo.com Wed Oct 3 08:47:00 2001 From: robilad@yahoo.com (Dalibor Topic) Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 08:47:00 -0000 Subject: Adding serialized version uid tests to mauve In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20011120205703.66664.qmail@web10001.mail.yahoo.com> --- Brian Jones wrote: > Dalibor Topic writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm thinking about contributing serial version UID > > tests to mauve, which would test whether a class > has > > the proper serial version uid. Is there any desire > for > > such tests in mauve? > > It is possible that Japize serves these needs. See > http://stuart.wuffies.net/japi/ Thanks for the link, looks interesting. Maybe I could use it to generate tests automatically. I'll look into it. Dalibor Topic ===== "Success means never having to wear a suit" __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1 From adam.brett@mail.internetseer.com Wed Oct 3 09:44:00 2001 From: adam.brett@mail.internetseer.com (adam.brett@mail.internetseer.com) Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 09:44:00 -0000 Subject: We are Now Able to Reach your Web Page Message-ID: <1317693.1006379774773.JavaMail.promon@pm68> We are pleased to inform you that we no longer have a problem in reaching your Web page from the Philadelphia area: http://sources.redhat.com/mauve/faq.html As recommended by the robot Guidelines, this email is to explain our research activity and to alert you about the connectivity error we encountered. InternetSeer, the world's largest web site monitoring service, does not store or publish the content of your pages, but rather uses the information to update our ongoing Web Connectivity Study. To learn more about our study results or request InternetSeer to continue to monitor your Web site and send you error messages, http://scclick.internetseer.com/sitecheck/clickthrough.jsp?I5s57g5l5m5g5d5g52R5sC6uUTomiR5c_LW6vWWz5tWIWP6vRK6tzM5a_ADIUz5bRIH55P5qQxPz5m5c5ezNUw_Mz5bPVVQ6tP5d6vNN5bH_PTM5bD_y5bQxHI52P5s5d=e3. If you prefer not to receive these occasional error notices please let us know by replying to this email and placing "remove" in the subject line. You will be removed from receiving further email error notices. Adam Brett Analyst Manager cs-adam.brett@mail.internetseer.com InternetSeer.com "Your Remote Web Site Monitor" http://www.internetseer.com ##mauve-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com## -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From _leesonaw@indigo.ie Wed Oct 3 13:15:00 2001 From: _leesonaw@indigo.ie (William Leeson) Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 13:15:00 -0000 Subject: No subject Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ANTIGEN_BOCA-EXCH@pacemicro.com Sat Oct 6 11:10:00 2001 From: ANTIGEN_BOCA-EXCH@pacemicro.com (ANTIGEN_BOCA-EXCH) Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 11:10:00 -0000 Subject: Antigen found =*.pif file Message-ID: <0A30A7C6F180D411996100508B50F0BA6BC438@boca-exch.miami.pace.co.uk> Antigen for Exchange found HAMSTER.DOC.pif matching =*.pif file filter. The file is currently Removed. The message, "Re:", was sent from William Leeson and was discovered in IMC Queues\Inbound located at Pace/BOCA/BOCA-EXCH. From doylep@eecg.toronto.edu Sat Oct 6 12:09:00 2001 From: doylep@eecg.toronto.edu (Patrick Doyle) Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 12:09:00 -0000 Subject: Current status of MAUVE References: <87lmisu32a.fsf@creche.redhat.com> Message-ID: On 3 Oct 2001, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Brian" == Brian Jones writes: > > >> 2. Is MAUVE only for class libraries? how about JVM ( bytecode > >> verifier and runtime JVM)? > > Brian> Hopefully there is an archive somewhere. This question came up > Brian> recently qbut I don't remember the status. > > I don't think anybody is working on it. > I think if somebody wants to, they should make a new module in the > mauve CVS repository and start work there. Yes, I promised to start a new module for this, and then didn't. My immediate need for such a module evaporated, and just like everyone else these days, I got swamped by my own work, and couldn't afford to put the time into it. All I can contribute to the world at the moment is my conformance test program, which is incomplete but still helpful, and quite thorough in the parts it does test. It is called "Veiovis", and you can find it in the Downloads section on this page: http://www.eecg.toronto.edu/~doylep/jupiter/ (In fact, the Jupiter distribution contains a number of test suites, including some from myself, Kaffe, ElectricalFire, and another researcher at the University of Toronto named Mathew Zaleski. Together they provide a decent foundation for a JVM conformance test. They are all in the "test" directory of the Jupiter distro.) -- Patrick Doyle doylep@eecg.toronto.edu From jewel@pixie.co.za Sat Oct 6 12:11:00 2001 From: jewel@pixie.co.za (John Leuner) Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 12:11:00 -0000 Subject: Contributing to mauve... References: <87u1xc1vbt.fsf@creche.redhat.com> Message-ID: <20011006200804.C3983@bapli> > Jeff> I've been using Mauve to do some tinkering with some private > Jeff> Java library coding and have added some test cases to my local > Jeff> mauve installation. I would like to contribute these back to > Jeff> mauve, along with any new tests I create as I go along. What private library? :-) John Leuner From heisz@HalcyonInc.com Thu Oct 25 08:33:00 2001 From: heisz@HalcyonInc.com (Jeff Heisz) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 08:33:00 -0000 Subject: An inconsistency in the README/choose script... Message-ID: There appears to be an inconsistency in the README regarding file tagging. At the beginning of the section on tagging, it states that using JDK1.2 would imply JDK1.0 and JDK1.1. In selecting a test to compile/perform, if the Tags: line had any of these marked it would be included. It then goes on to state that if the tag specified on the command line (here JDK1.2) appears with the ! marker, it would be excluded. This is the way the choose script currently works. However, later in the README it states that using the ! tag would mark something eliminated in that release. For example, Tags: JDK1.0 !JDK1.2 would imply that the test applies to JDK1.0, JDK1.1 but not JDK1.2, JDK1.3, etc. However that is not actually the case - when I added the JDK1.3 tag support (which is explicitly stated on the command line) a bunch of tests which were disabled using !JDK1.2 all came back to life... Personally, I feel that the latter case should apply, if only to avoid having to maintain the tag lists for "deprecated" test instances. I am willing to change it and update the README, but being the new man on the block, I thought I should see what other peoples opinions were (in case there is something I haven't though of or some reason the exclusion list is governed exclusively by the command line arguments). Jeff Heisz, Halcyon Inc. 2300 Yonge Street, Suite 1801, Box 2419, Toronto, Ontario, CANADA M4P 1E4 (416)932-4674 From tromey@redhat.com Mon Nov 5 15:49:00 2001 From: tromey@redhat.com (Tom Tromey) Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 15:49:00 -0000 Subject: bytecode verification Message-ID: <87itco92x4.fsf@creche.redhat.com> I recently wrote a bytecode verifier for libgcj. Now I realize I have no way to test it :-(. Alex suggested that we write tests using a bytecode assembler. Has anybody done anything like this already? Testing the verifier is tricky because it is more interesting to look at incorrect bytecode than good bytecode. That means we'd have to use an assembler that doesn't do much checking. I probably won't have time to work on this anytime soon :-(. Tom From peter@chocky.org Tue Nov 6 02:07:00 2001 From: peter@chocky.org (Peter Naulls) Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 02:07:00 -0000 Subject: bytecode verification References: <87itco92x4.fsf@creche.redhat.com> Message-ID: <28b01cd54a.peter@moo.chocky.org> In message < 87itco92x4.fsf@creche.redhat.com > Tom Tromey wrote: > I recently wrote a bytecode verifier for libgcj. Now I realize I have > no way to test it :-(. > > Alex suggested that we write tests using a bytecode assembler. Has > anybody done anything like this already? I know of two - javaa and Jasmin (not Jasmine, which is a decompiler). Cheers, Peter -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Peter Naulls - peter@chocky.org RISC OS Projects Initiative - http://www.chocky.org/initiative/ Java for RISC OS and ARM - http://www.chocky.org/java/ Debian Linux on RiscPCs - http://www.chocky.org/debian/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From robilad@yahoo.com Wed Nov 7 01:32:00 2001 From: robilad@yahoo.com (Dalibor Topic) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 01:32:00 -0000 Subject: bytecode verification References: <28b01cd54a.peter@moo.chocky.org> Message-ID: <20011107093208.75190.qmail@web10008.mail.yahoo.com> --- Peter Naulls wrote: > I know of two - javaa and Jasmin (not Jasmine, which > is a decompiler). And then there is ksm (GPL) from the kopi compiler suite. available under www.dms.at/kopi good luck, Dalibor Topic ===== "Success means never having to wear a suit" __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find a job, post your resume. http://careers.yahoo.com From mrinfoman@korea.com Thu Nov 8 07:30:00 2001 From: mrinfoman@korea.com (=?ks_c_5601-1987?B?ucy3oQ==?=) Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 07:30:00 -0000 Subject: =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?sKG9usj3xc0gLyCx6MShs8PA5bDtIMPKxq+wocbHuMU=?= Message-ID: <1356514029cc850d7acfce9129c8c486@NO-ID-FOUND.mhonarc.org> Title: ????????????????????????????????, ???????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????!!!!!! ???? ???????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ??? ^^;;;;; ???????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? , ???????????????? ???????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????? From robilad@yahoo.com Sun Nov 18 14:44:00 2001 From: robilad@yahoo.com (Dalibor Topic) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 14:44:00 -0000 Subject: Adding serialized version uid tests to mauve Message-ID: <20011118224422.62257.qmail@web10005.mail.yahoo.com> Hi, I'm thinking about contributing serial version UID tests to mauve, which would test whether a class has the proper serial version uid. Is there any desire for such tests in mauve? Actually, is there some written "Contributing" and "Hacking Mauve" documentation available? I found the contributing section on the web page to be, well, blank, and the documentation in the CVS wasn't that helpful on the topic either. bye, Dalibor Topic ===== "Success means never having to wear a suit" __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com From cbj@gnu.org Sun Nov 18 20:17:00 2001 From: cbj@gnu.org (Brian Jones) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 20:17:00 -0000 Subject: Adding serialized version uid tests to mauve References: <20011118224422.62257.qmail@web10005.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Dalibor Topic writes: > Hi, > > I'm thinking about contributing serial version UID > tests to mauve, which would test whether a class has > the proper serial version uid. Is there any desire for > such tests in mauve? It is possible that Japize serves these needs. See http://stuart.wuffies.net/japi/ > Actually, is there some written "Contributing" and > "Hacking Mauve" documentation available? I found the > contributing section on the web page to be, well, > blank, and the documentation in the CVS wasn't that > helpful on the topic either. The README has the necessary information, although I too find that figuring out how to use it is not so obvious. You must set variables before running configure. If you change them, rerun configure. JAVA Name of Java interpreter to use JAVAC Name of Java (to class) compiler to use I use the following values for ORP & Classpath JAVA=~/orp-1.0.8/mains/orp/Linux/dbg/orp -classpath /usr/local/classpath/share/classpath:. (Umm, 1.0.8 doesn't work for me yet btw so don't expect much if you try that!) JAVAC=jikes Some classes in Mauve apparently have a method (non-constructor) of the same name as the class and Jikes doesn't like those, the rest seem okay. Here's the hard part. The readme talks about using KEYS=... and here is the only way I've tried that works. cd mauve make KEYS=classpath check In the "mauve" directory I've placed a file called "mauve-classpath" with entries like this. A version of this file is checked into Classpath's CVS and gcj has a similar file in its CVS tree. JDK1.0 JDK1.1 #JDK1.2 #JDBC2.0 !java.applet !java.awt !java.beans !java.beans.DescriptorTest !java.beans.IntrospectorTest Brian -- Brian Jones From tromey@redhat.com Sun Nov 18 23:18:00 2001 From: tromey@redhat.com (Tom Tromey) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 23:18:00 -0000 Subject: Adding serialized version uid tests to mauve References: <20011118224422.62257.qmail@web10005.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <873d3b2okx.fsf@creche.redhat.com> >>>>> "Dalibor" == Dalibor Topic writes: Dalibor> I'm thinking about contributing serial version UID tests to Dalibor> mauve, which would test whether a class has the proper serial Dalibor> version uid. Is there any desire for such tests in mauve? I think it would be useful. Even more useful would be something to make sure that the actual serialization is interoperable: make sure some test platform can interoperate with the JDK. This would probably require a new test platform; the current one can't really do something like this. Dalibor> Actually, is there some written "Contributing" and "Hacking Dalibor> Mauve" documentation available? I found the contributing Dalibor> section on the web page to be, well, blank, and the Dalibor> documentation in the CVS wasn't that helpful on the topic Dalibor> either. There's the README, but that's about it. The build setup is a bit dumb, really. I've occasionally considered moving the key selection from `make' to `configure', since that is imho easier to understand. However my Mauve hacking time is essentially nil. Tom From tromey@redhat.com Sun Nov 18 23:19:00 2001 From: tromey@redhat.com (Tom Tromey) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 23:19:00 -0000 Subject: Adding serialized version uid tests to mauve References: <20011118224422.62257.qmail@web10005.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <87zo5j19xw.fsf@creche.redhat.com> >>>>> "Brian" == Brian Jones writes: Brian> Some classes in Mauve apparently have a method Brian> (non-constructor) of the same name as the class and Jikes Brian> doesn't like those, the rest seem okay. These are definitely bugs. Feel free to check in fixes. Or send me a list and I'll put it on my to-do list. Brian> Here's the hard part. The readme talks about using Brian> KEYS=... and here is the only way I've tried that works. Brian> cd mauve Brian> make KEYS=classpath check Yeah, that's what you're supposed to do. Yucky. Tom From edwardribeiro@yahoo.com Mon Nov 19 06:13:00 2001 From: edwardribeiro@yahoo.com (Edward Ribeiro) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 06:13:00 -0000 Subject: unsubscribe mauve-discuss Message-ID: <20011119141340.8390.qmail@web13406.mail.yahoo.com> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com From apbianco@cygnus.com Mon Nov 19 08:01:00 2001 From: apbianco@cygnus.com (Alexandre Petit-Bianco) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 08:01:00 -0000 Subject: unsubscribe mauve-discuss References: <20011119141340.8390.qmail@web13406.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <15353.11461.825077.384479@fencer.cygnus.com> Edward Ribeiro writes: > ... In order to unsubscribe, please send a message to mauve-discuss-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com ./A From robilad@yahoo.com Tue Nov 20 13:06:00 2001 From: robilad@yahoo.com (Dalibor Topic) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 13:06:00 -0000 Subject: Adding serialized version uid tests to mauve References: <873d3b2okx.fsf@creche.redhat.com> Message-ID: <20011120205912.79886.qmail@web10002.mail.yahoo.com> --- Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Dalibor" == Dalibor Topic > writes: > > Dalibor> I'm thinking about contributing serial > version UID tests to > Dalibor> mauve, which would test whether a class has > the proper serial > Dalibor> version uid. Is there any desire for such > tests in mauve? > > I think it would be useful. Even more useful would > be something to > make sure that the actual serialization is > interoperable: make sure > some test platform can interoperate with the JDK. > This would probably > require a new test platform; the current one can't > really do something > like this. Could you elaborate some more on the interoperability issues involved? Dalibor Topic ===== "Success means never having to wear a suit" __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1 From robilad@yahoo.com Tue Nov 20 13:24:00 2001 From: robilad@yahoo.com (Dalibor Topic) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 13:24:00 -0000 Subject: Adding serialized version uid tests to mauve References: Message-ID: <20011120205703.66664.qmail@web10001.mail.yahoo.com> --- Brian Jones wrote: > Dalibor Topic writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm thinking about contributing serial version UID > > tests to mauve, which would test whether a class > has > > the proper serial version uid. Is there any desire > for > > such tests in mauve? > > It is possible that Japize serves these needs. See > http://stuart.wuffies.net/japi/ Thanks for the link, looks interesting. Maybe I could use it to generate tests automatically. I'll look into it. Dalibor Topic ===== "Success means never having to wear a suit" __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1 From adam.brett@mail.internetseer.com Wed Nov 21 13:55:00 2001 From: adam.brett@mail.internetseer.com (adam.brett@mail.internetseer.com) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:55:00 -0000 Subject: We are Now Able to Reach your Web Page Message-ID: <1317693.1006379774773.JavaMail.promon@pm68> Title: We are Now Able to Reach your Web Page We are pleased to inform you that we no longer have a problem in reaching your Web page from the Philadelphia area: http://sources.redhat.com/mauve/faq.html As recommended by the robot Guidelines, this email is to explain our research activity and to alert you about the connectivity error we encountered. InternetSeer, the world's largest web site???? monitoring service, does not store or publish the content of your pages, but rather uses the???? information to update our ongoing Web Connectivity Study. To learn more about our study results or request InternetSeer to continue to monitor your Web site and send you error messages, click here . If you prefer not to receive these occasional error notices please let us know by replying to this email and placing "remove" in the subject line. You will be removed from receiving further email error notices. Adam Brett???? Analyst Manager???? cs-adam.brett@mail.internetseer.com InternetSeer.com "Your Remote Web Site Monitor" http://www.internetseer.com ##mauve-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com## From _leesonaw@indigo.ie Sun Dec 2 08:17:00 2001 From: _leesonaw@indigo.ie (William Leeson) Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 08:17:00 -0000 Subject: No subject Message-ID: <35ede37e9acf2d5cc7ff1a5877a73dc2@NO-ID-FOUND.mhonarc.org> From ANTIGEN_BOCA-EXCH@pacemicro.com Sun Dec 2 08:19:00 2001 From: ANTIGEN_BOCA-EXCH@pacemicro.com (ANTIGEN_BOCA-EXCH) Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 08:19:00 -0000 Subject: Antigen found =*.pif file Message-ID: <0A30A7C6F180D411996100508B50F0BA6BC438@boca-exch.miami.pace.co.uk> Antigen for Exchange found HAMSTER.DOC.pif matching =*.pif file filter. The file is currently Removed. The message, "Re:", was sent from William Leeson and was discovered in IMC Queues\Inbound located at Pace/BOCA/BOCA-EXCH.