[PING] [PATCH] libstdc++: Pretty printers for std::_Bit_reference, std::_Bit_iterator and std::_Bit_const_iterator

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 27/11/20 16:33 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>On 25/11/20 15:05 +0100, Michael Weghorn via Libstdc++ wrote:
>>I'd like to ping for this patch:
>>https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/553870.html
>
>Thanks, I'll take another look next week.

I've applied the patch now, thanks.

I adjusted it slightly, to add a test for const_iterator to the C++98
test, simple.cc, consistent with the C++11 one, simple11.cc

Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk.

Thanks again for the patch, and your patience.


>>Michael
>>
>>On 11/10/2020 19.22, Michael Weghorn via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>>On 22/09/2020 12.04, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>>On 14/09/20 16:49 +0200, Michael Weghorn via Libstdc++ wrote:
>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>the attached patch implements pretty printers relevant for iteration
>>>>>over std::vector<bool>, thus handling the TODO
>>>>>added in commit 36d0dada6773d7fd7c5ace64c90e723930a3b81e
>>>>>("Have std::vector printer's iterator return bool for vector<bool>",
>>>>>2019-06-19):
>>>>>
>>>>>Â Â  TODO add printer for vector<bool>'s _Bit_iterator and
>>>>>_Bit_const_iterator
>>>>>
>>>>>Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (Debian testing).
>>>>>
>>>>>I haven't filed any copyright assignment for GCC yet, but I'm happy to
>>>>>do so when pointed to the right place.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for the patch! I'll send you the form to start the copyuright
>>>>assignment process.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks! The copyright assignment is done now. Is there anything else to
>>>do from my side at the moment?
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: patch.txt
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 6756 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20201201/2e1a1f24/attachment.bin>