Relocation (= move+destroy)
Marc Glisse
marc.glisse@inria.fr
Thu Oct 18 20:44:00 GMT 2018
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 18/10/18 21:59 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>>> That's a good enough reason for me. Unless one of us implements
>>> noexcept(auto) in GCC and Clang in the next few days, let's go with
>>> what you have in the patch :-)
>>
>> Just checking: this 'ok' is for the noexcept style, it is not a review for
>> the complete patch yet, right?
>
> Right. I think I looked over the rest quickly and it seemed OK, but I
> thought you were going to send a revised patch changing the triviality
> test so was going to wait and review the revised patch. But since that
> change is tiny I can still review the rest now anyway, so I'll do that
> tomorrow.
Ah, sorry for the misunderstanding, here is the version with is_trivial,
which regtested fine. Same ChangeLog.
--
Marc Glisse
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: reloc.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 25161 bytes
Desc:
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20181018/22175f1e/attachment.bin>
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list