Optimizing C++ Move Functions in Stl

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 12/12/18 17:17 +0200, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 17:14, nick <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > I think there's an attempt to ascertain that mostly constructors and
>> > assignment operators need noexcept-fixes,
>> > because that noexcept-ness is directly trait-detectable.
>> > That would match my current understanding of the situation for at
>> > least pair and tuple.
>> >
>>
>>
>> Yes that's true. I was also asking about is there a TODO list for the current release
>> of gcc 9 as Jonathan mentioned this work is a stage 1 fix or feature and should wait
>> until gcc 10 stage 1 so was wondering what work is needed in the current stage 3.
>>
>> Sorry for the confusion with the previous email and hopefully this makes more sense,
>
>We don't have a specific TODO list for gcc 9. For general stuff, we have
>https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LibstdcxxTodo
>which is a bit out of date...

I think he's asking about GCC in general, not just libstdc++. The
answer is that fixing bugs is appropriate for stage 3, so pick any
open bugs from Bugzilla.