[v3 PATCH] Implement N4387 and LWG 2367

Martin Sebor msebor@redhat.com
Mon Jun 8 15:37:00 GMT 2015


>      * include/std/tuple

In the hunk below, should the sizes_match template parameter
be privatized (since it isn't part of the public interface)?
Or perhaps even removed if it's not used?

Martin

@ -457,6 +457,73 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
        }
      };

+
+  // Concept utility functions
+  template <bool sizes_match, typename... _Elements>
+  struct _TC



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list