[Patch, PR 61061] Add state limit for regex NFA
Jonathan Wakely
jwakely@redhat.com
Thu Jul 17 10:38:00 GMT 2014
On 17/07/14 12:24 +0200, Maksymilian A wrote:
>Hi Jonathan,
>
>The default value for mentioned 'pre set level' isn't specified. I
Of course not. The standard does not know how an implementation works
or what is considered too complex for every system. A single value
would not make sense for all systems, from embedded microcontrollers
to supercomputers.
>think that we need new safe and extended RE type or user should
>determine security level of complexity.
I don't think that's a good idea.
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list