Fix code regression
Paolo Carlini
paolo.carlini@oracle.com
Sun Sep 23 10:27:00 GMT 2012
Hi,
On 09/23/2012 12:08 PM, François Dumont wrote:
> Hi
>
> I detect this regression while running performance tests. I think
> it comes from:
>
> 2012-04-12 Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
>
> * include/bits/unordered_map.h (__unordered_map): Remove.
> (__unordered_multimap): Remove.
> Add aliases for __umap_traits, __umap_hashtable, __ummap_traits,
> __ummap_hashtable.
> (unordered_map): Derive from __umap_hashtable.
> (unordered_multimap): Derive from __ummap_hashtable.
> * include/bits/unordered_set.h (__unordered_set): Remove.
> (__unordered_multiset): Remove.
> ...
>
> 2012-09-19 François Dumont <fdumont@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> * testsuite/performance/23_containers/insert_erase/41975.cc: Use
> __uset_hashtable rather than now missing __unordered_set.
>
> Ok to commit ?
Given the current code, I think it qualifies as obvious. Anyway, too bad
anyway that we don't have anymore the __unordered_* names for the
extension containers taking an additional parameter, seemed very natural.
By the way, Francois, I think it's time to commit the patch for
44436... and thanks again!
Thanks,
Paolo.
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list