Optimize hashtable allocator
Paolo Carlini
paolo.carlini@oracle.com
Wed Oct 31 10:11:00 GMT 2012
Hi,
On 10/30/2012 10:26 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> According latest
>> messages I understood it was still time to break ABI for unordered
>> containers, at least I hope so.
> Paolo?
Yes, as you remarked, lately we fiddled quite a bit with these
containers. We had too. Luckily, since they don't exist in C++98 mode,
we don't the kind of annoying issue we have with std::list vs size and I
don't think a quality implementation can renounce to the EBO for the
allocator, since it benefits the vast majority of users most of the
times. When we globally break the ABI we have to do the same for the
associative containers too.
Thanks!
Paolo.
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list