Our docs about --enable/--disable-visibility
Paolo Carlini
paolo.carlini@oracle.com
Mon Oct 31 10:48:00 GMT 2011
On 10/31/2011 11:41 AM, Vincenzo Innocente wrote:
> The problem is that "default" means "force external visibility", not
> "use user visibility". "the large majority of the users" will not set
> visibility at all, therefore "no decoration" will be equivalent to
> "external visibility". The current default instead forces those
> willing to control visibility to recompile the compiler
Doesn't seem a big issue to me, frankly, we are talking about a very
small fraction of the users and hey, in general, people should get used
(again?) to tweak and re-build Free Software! Here we are *not*
providing Black Boxes!! ;)
Paolo.
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list