[libstdc++] Reference GNU/Linux in doc/xml/manual/using.xml

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Sun, 13 Nov 2011, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Would that be improved by replacing i386 with x86?
> 
> libstdc++ omits several features when built for 80386 due to the lack
> of certain atomic operations, so I think it might be useful if the
> manual used x86 to refer to the generic architecture, as opposed to
> i386 which makes me think of -march=i386.

Sure, your logic makes a lot of sense.  Happy to make this change
for you.

The patch below just went in.  It is the last I have for libstdc++
for now.  Would you mind regenerating the HTML files from their
XML sources as we had discussed a bit ago?

Thanks,
Gerald


2011-11-27  Gerald Pfeifer  <gerald@pfeifer.com>

	* doc/xml/manual/using.xml (Prerequisites): Refer to x86 instead
	of i386.

Index: doc/xml/manual/using.xml
===================================================================
--- doc/xml/manual/using.xml	(revision 181742)
+++ doc/xml/manual/using.xml	(working copy)
@@ -1269,7 +1269,7 @@
       to display how ad hoc this is: On Solaris, both -pthreads and
       -threads (with subtly different meanings) are honored.  On OSF,
       -pthread and -threads (with subtly different meanings) are
-      honored.  On GNU/Linux i386, -pthread is honored.  On FreeBSD,
+      honored.  On GNU/Linux x86, -pthread is honored.  On FreeBSD,
       -pthread is honored.  Some other ports use other switches.
       AFAIK, none of this is properly documented anywhere other than
       in ``gcc -dumpspecs'' (look at lib and cpp entries).