safe unordered local iterators

François Dumont francois.cppdevs@free.fr
Fri Jul 22 00:44:00 GMT 2011


Attached patch applied:

2011-07-21  François Dumont <francois.cppdevs@free.fr>

         * include/debug/safe_unordered_sequence.h,
         safe_unordered_sequence.tcc: Rename respectively in...
         * include/debug/safe_unordered_container.h,
         safe_unordered_container.tcc: ...those. _Safe_unordered_sequence
         rename _Safe_unordered_container.
         * include/debug/safe_unordered_base.h: 
_Safe_unordered_sequence_base
         rename _Safe_unordered_container_base.
         * include/debug/unordered_map, unordered_set: Adapt to previous
         modifications.
         * config/abi/pre/gnu.ver: Likewise.
         * src/debug.cc: Likewise.
         * include/Makefile.am: Likewise.
         * include/Makefile.in: Regenerate.

Regards


On 07/21/2011 12:58 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 20 July 2011 22:40, Paolo Carlini<paolo.carlini@oracle.com>  wrote:
>> On 07/20/2011 10:46 PM, François Dumont wrote:
>>> Hello
>>>
>>>     Sorry for the inconvenience. Here is my proposition for the renaming, I
> I should probably apologise for the inconvenience for suggesting
> changing it!  I do think it is a bit confusing though, the "Sequence"
> containers in the standard library have a definite ordering, so an
> unordered sequence is confusing :)
>
>>> haven't tested it yet but will of course before commiting.
>> I'm Ok with it if Jonathan is...
> Yes, thanks for changing it.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Paolo.
>>
>> PS: my first language obviously isn't English, but I see you are using
>> <proposition>  a lot where I would normally prefer<proposal>...
> Yes, proposal would be correct there.
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: safe_containers.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 30166 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20110722/dcebb6b9/attachment.bin>


More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list