safe unordered local iterators
François Dumont
francois.cppdevs@free.fr
Fri Jul 22 00:44:00 GMT 2011
Attached patch applied:
2011-07-21 François Dumont <francois.cppdevs@free.fr>
* include/debug/safe_unordered_sequence.h,
safe_unordered_sequence.tcc: Rename respectively in...
* include/debug/safe_unordered_container.h,
safe_unordered_container.tcc: ...those. _Safe_unordered_sequence
rename _Safe_unordered_container.
* include/debug/safe_unordered_base.h:
_Safe_unordered_sequence_base
rename _Safe_unordered_container_base.
* include/debug/unordered_map, unordered_set: Adapt to previous
modifications.
* config/abi/pre/gnu.ver: Likewise.
* src/debug.cc: Likewise.
* include/Makefile.am: Likewise.
* include/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
Regards
On 07/21/2011 12:58 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 20 July 2011 22:40, Paolo Carlini<paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:
>> On 07/20/2011 10:46 PM, François Dumont wrote:
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> Sorry for the inconvenience. Here is my proposition for the renaming, I
> I should probably apologise for the inconvenience for suggesting
> changing it! I do think it is a bit confusing though, the "Sequence"
> containers in the standard library have a definite ordering, so an
> unordered sequence is confusing :)
>
>>> haven't tested it yet but will of course before commiting.
>> I'm Ok with it if Jonathan is...
> Yes, thanks for changing it.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Paolo.
>>
>> PS: my first language obviously isn't English, but I see you are using
>> <proposition> a lot where I would normally prefer<proposal>...
> Yes, proposal would be correct there.
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: safe_containers.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 30166 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20110722/dcebb6b9/attachment.bin>
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list