[PATCH] Exploit move semantics in std::accumulate.

[Eelis van der Weegen]

On 2011-01-08 22:25, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 8 January 2011 20:53, Eelis van der Weegen wrote:
>>
>> This /does/ seem like a legitimate worry to me, that I indeed had not
>> considered. :(  Do I understand correctly that you've already brought
>> this issue up on the committee's secret mailing list? I'm afraid I can't
>> look myself because I don't have access to these secret mailing lists..
> 
> They're not secret, they're just not public, because otherwise nothing
> would ever get done.

I don't think this mailing list is really the place to debate the merits
of the committee's somewhat conservative policy when it comes to
openness and transparency in this regard.

> The comp.std.c++, comp.lang.c++ and c.l.c.m
> newsgroups are actively read by committee members if you want to bring
> something up, or you can contact committee members directly.

I briefly talked to a committee member who mentioned something about
Chris already having brought the issue up on the
"non-public-yet-not-secret" mailing list, which would remove the need
for me to do so on the public mailing lists you mention. I merely asked
for confirmation.