Another go at max_digits10 and lowest() to numeric_limits for C++-0x

[Paolo Carlini]

On 02/25/2010 05:56 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> constexpr does not change mangling.  It only has a compile-time
> semantics effect, e.g. where a function call can be used and what
> happens.
>   
Great. Indeed I was skimming through the WP and was (humbly) coming to
the same conclusion.

Thus, I'm applying the below.

Thanks,
Paolo.

///////////////////
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: patch_limits_a
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20100225/46ebb3f5/attachment.ksh>