[c++0x] result_of

[Jonathan Wakely]

2008/10/5 Paolo Carlini:
>
> Earlier today I added the C++0x versions of the existing
> tr1::reference_wrapper tests + the testcase from libstdc++/24803 (which
> I assigned to myself, but only tentatively): while we are touching
> reference_wrapper too, we should make sure not to regress, and, if
> possible, we should also fix 24803 (the minimal version). Can you double
> check your existing patch vs the 3 additional testcases? And / or we can
> imagine splitting out the reference_wrapper changes... probably I'm Ok
> with any plan you may want to suggest... Just let me know...

Thanks for CCing me on the other PRs, I'll review them and run the new
testcases in the next couple of days and get back to you.

Cheers,
Jonathan