parallel for_each not parallel?

Johannes Singler singler@ira.uka.de
Wed Nov 5 17:04:00 GMT 2008


Germán Diago wrote:
> I also tried __gnu_parallel::for_each. Same as above (sequential).

Can you try with this patch first, please?

<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2008-09/msg00116.html>

-- Johannes



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list