[v3] unified TOC for docs, phase 1

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 13/11/2007, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Here's the first pass at cleaning up the libstdc++ docs. I have a
> master plan for this, which I will post in another thread.

Sweet!  As you know, I've tried to make small improvements to the docs
over the years, but never on a grand scale like this.

I was planning on submitting the attached patch but since you're
obviously working with the docs now, it might conflict or fail to
apply soon, so I'll just post it here.  It fixes some 3.x-era
anachronisms, and some more blatant lies (the example showing how to
include the extension headers is wrong, since it handles 4.0 the same
as 3.0, the minimum binutils needed to build is waaaaay out of date
etc)

Would you like me to try and apply bits of this, or would you rather
take bits and merge them with your re-worked tree?

Jon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: docs.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 20500 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20071113/a01cad4f/attachment.bin>