-Wconversion versus libstdc++

Manuel López-Ibáñez lopezibanez@gmail.com
Wed Jan 17 23:59:00 GMT 2007


On 17/01/07, Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> wrote:
> ... thanks a lot Gaby both for your practical and theoretical
> investigations into this issue, both right to the point! Now, in my
> opinion, we should simply remove the bits about signed -> unsigned from
> -Wconversion.
>

I am not sure I am following the conversation.

So, are you saying that Wconversion should not warn for unsigned int x = -10; ?
Or are you talking about a particular especial case?

Cheers,

Manuel.



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list