Whats happening without _GLIBCXX_ASSERT in testsuite?

chris jefferson caj@cs.york.ac.uk
Fri May 27 13:43:00 GMT 2005


Paolo Carlini wrote:

>chris jefferson wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Sorry, I did remember, but should perhaps have been clearer about what
>>I meant in my mail. I remember you telling me this was an older method
>>of running the testsuite.
>>    
>>
>
>I told you much more. I don't like being addressed private email,
>answering plenty of details, and then reading messages that gives the
>impression that completely new things are being discovered and noticed.
>
>  
>
I apologise. Re-reading this mail and that mail, I now see my confusion 
was that I believed that the "test" variable method was supposed to be a 
valid method of running the existing testsuite and getting back success 
/ failure, instead of providing a method (now depricated) in which the 
testsuite could be written (taking notice of the value "test" takes). 
I'll try to pay more attention in future.

Chris



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list