[Patch] libstdc++/19664

[Paolo Carlini]

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

>>Like? I have no idea which is the right syntax?!? We are using this
>>approach in libsupc++ and Mark confirmed or not?!?
>>    
>>
>Sorry, I just re-read that bugzilla list. It seems as if that is a
>feature enhancement, and that this goo is what is going to be the
>current approach. Boo.
>
>I'll write the feature enhancement.
>  
>
I would appreciate that. Also, if you could contact people actually
involved with the visibility stuff, we are really in trouble for lack of
maintainers: that's whay I'm so scared by the prospect of punting until
we have also an extension to namespaces... :(

>However, I'm going to insist that you put in a placeholder test case in
>the testsuite for this. We will never be able to track this linkage issue without it.
>  
>
100% right. What I want to do is preparing a clean v3-specific testcase,
xfaild for now, that would pass only with the series of three patches
mentioned here, for example:

    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg02042.html

applied. Will commit the v3 changes *only* together with the testcase.

Paolo.