[Patch/RFC] libstdc++/19495

[Paolo Carlini]

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

>>100% agreed. Summarizing, we have at least two open issues:
>>1- Avoiding _Rep in static memory, probably we can neatly obtain that 
>>via a "short-string optimization" type solution.
>>    
>>
>
>libstdc++/16612
>
>We should probably put this in enhancement status, not resolved, since
>workarounds exist but we'd like to do better. Thoughts?
>  
>
Done, re-opened as "enhancement".

>100% agreed!
>
>This could initially go in as an extension, if you'd like to work that
>way. We could have a __gnu_cxx::basic_string, for instance.
>
>Just a thought.
>  
>
Yes, that's a nice idea, very soon we'll start on this.

Paolo.