Future evolution of c++config.h and _GLIBCXX_USE_LONG_LONG

[Paolo Carlini]

Hi,

> I'm leaning toward choice 1: it's inelegant but probably safe.  Anyone 
> want to give me arguments in either direction, or suggest a third choice?

Instinctively, I agree with you, and, furthermore:

    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2004-08/msg00183.html

Paolo.