[v3] more istream::ignore cleanups
Paolo Carlini
pcarlini@suse.de
Tue Jan 11 19:42:00 GMT 2005
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>>Are those discussions recorded somewhere? In the LWG reflector? I would be
>>interested in the details: actually, strictly speaking, the whole LFS
>>idea is not compatible with the C++ standard in the present form...
>>
>>
>... on the archives of this list.
>
>See:
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2004-09/msg00110.html
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2004-09/msg00126.html
>
>etc, etc, etc.
>
>Try google with (streamsize lfs site:gcc.gnu.org)
>
>
Ok, you convinced me that probably this is the most consistent solution.
The below is what I'm finishing regtesting.
Paolo.
//////////////////
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: CL_ignore_pb
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20050111/a07c42d7/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: patch_ignore_pb
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20050111/a07c42d7/attachment-0001.ksh>
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list