[v3] more istream::ignore cleanups

Paolo Carlini pcarlini@suse.de
Tue Jan 11 19:42:00 GMT 2005


Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

>>Are those discussions recorded somewhere? In the LWG reflector? I would  be
>>interested in the details: actually, strictly speaking, the whole LFS 
>>idea is not compatible with the C++ standard in the present form...
>>    
>>
>... on the archives of this list.
>
>See:
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2004-09/msg00110.html
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2004-09/msg00126.html
>
>etc, etc, etc. 
>
>Try google with (streamsize lfs site:gcc.gnu.org)
>  
>
Ok, you convinced me that probably this is the most consistent solution.

The below is what I'm finishing regtesting.

Paolo.

//////////////////
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: CL_ignore_pb
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20050111/a07c42d7/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: patch_ignore_pb
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20050111/a07c42d7/attachment-0001.ksh>


More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list