C++ PATCH: Disallow floating-point literals in integral-constant expressions
Joe Buck
Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM
Tue Feb 1 20:59:00 GMT 2005
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 12:16:14PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> My thinking is that we've been disallowing template parameters of
> floating-point type for a while now. If we really want to allow
> constant expressions of floating-point type forever more, we ought to
> also allow template parameters of floating-point type as well.
I would argue against allowing template parameters of floating-point
type, because you get two distinct functions instead of one because
of rounding errors: func<1.0> vs func<0.9999999999999>.
I have no objection to deprecating floating point static constants;
I just think we should follow our normal policy of issuing warnings first.
> Furthemore, deprecating the extension doesn't make it impossible for us
> to keep it -- but it does make it easier to remove it.
Agreed.
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list