Deque::fill

[Paolo Carlini]

chris jefferson wrote:

> I mainly ask as I had a look a while ago at simplifying deque in the
> case that the objects are big enough it "degrades" into a vector of
> pointers to pointers. While the best simplifications would require
> ABI-breaking, it's possible to overload things like operator++,
> operator+, etc on _Deque_iterators with simpler versions which the
> compiler doesn't seem capable of deducing by itself.

By the way, personally I think this is a very nice idea! If would
encourage you to explore it further...

Paolo.