Valarray work (Was... Re: Efficiency)

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> writes:

| Paolo Carlini wrote:
| 
| >Otherwise, in the meanwhile I'm going to look into possible more subtle
| >binary compatibility issues...
| >  
| >
| Well, struct _Array... Maybe it would be better not changing it to a
| POD, at least not immediately, we should look a bit more into that (I'm
| concerned that argument passing will change, as you remark in the
| comment, and that would be highly disruptive :(.

OK; that is why I wanted to have feedback from you.

| If you think the performance disadvantages are bearable, for now, I
| would suggest not touching it, I don't think the change is strictly
| intertwined with the other and should be possible to deal with it
| separately, later...

Understood.
(as I was passing there, I just wanted to clean up the mess.)

-- Gaby