SPAM: Re: -fno-exceptions documentation

[Martin Sebor]

Paolo Carlini wrote:
[...]
> Ah, now I see! You mean, when the library itself is built (libsupc++, in
> particular), _EXCEPTION_NEUTRAL is defined. Then, when the headers are
> included, _EXCEPTION_NEUTRAL is *not* defined, and, depending on
> __EXCEPTIONS the appropriate definition is used.
> 
> I like the idea.
> 
> Maybe I have a concern, however: I think people are also using libsupc++
> *alone*, without the rest of the libstdc++ library, I'm not sure what we
> should do in that case...

Yes, they are. Please don't forget about them! :)

Martin