Iterator "convertable to" problem

[chris jefferson]

Paolo Carlini wrote:

> chris jefferson wrote:
>
>> The problem stems from the various places where the standard says 
>> that the return types of various operators on iterators have to be 
>> "convertable to T", "convertable to bool", etc.
>
>
> You mean convert/*i*/ble, right? ;) ;) Sorry, couldn't resist...
>
Sorry, I should probably learn how to spell :)

However, on a related note, do you have any comments on if we have to 
start static_casting lots of things :)

Chris