vector/deque/list derived allocator issue

[Dhruv Matani]

On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 23:54, B. Kosnik wrote:
> >It's attached with this message.
> 
> Excellent work, thanks.
> 
> The vector/list/deque bits are in.

Thanks :-)


> >Also, this includes the patch for stl_tree and cpp_type_traits.
> 
> This bit failed testing. I've changed it to the following patch, which
> passes with no regressions.

Exactly which test fails?

I want to know because your correction nullifies the part of the code
that reduces the size of the rb_tree if the comparison function is
actually an optimizable struct like std::less.

Thanks.


-- 
	-Dhruv Matani.
http://www.geocities.com/dhruvbird/

Proud to be a Vegetarian.
http://www.vegetarianstarterkit.com/
http://www.vegkids.com/vegkids/index.html