Patch: stl_vector.h and vector.tcc

[Matt Austern]

On Jul 31, 2004, at 9:59 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> writes:
>
> | Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> |
> | >I think it makes more sense to make include/tr1/type_traits,
> | >tr1/type_compare, tr1/type_transform. These includes would be 
> modeled on
> | >the proposed files in TR1.  Also remove all the various other traits
> | >bits we have now: bits/type_traits.h, bits/cpp_type_traits.h.
> | >
> | Hi Benjamin, all,
> |
> | taking into account both your and Matt messages (his "snag", in
> | particular) seems
> | still a nice idea completing the project that I started before my
> | vacations (as a side
> | effect of moving from function templates overloads to class templates
> | partial
> | specializations): changing all the library to use *only*
> | cpp_type_traits.h. Now that
> | stl_algobase.h is done, the rest of the project is just a matter of
> | few hours of work.
> | I can post a patch next week.
>
>
> I believe Matt's suggestion is the right long term approach, assuming
> we have an implementation of #nospam.  For the mid-term, I think that
> using bits/cpp_type_traits.h is the most viable option -- with proper
> uglification.

I wonder if this does have to be "long term"?  If we think that we
have a good specification of preprocessor scoping, I bet it won't
be that hard to implement.

I don't attend EWG sessions, so I don't have a good sense of how it
was received.  Did it look to you as if the feature is ready to
implement as Bjarne proposed it?

			--Matt