[Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1

[Wichmann, Mats D]

This looks like it needed a clarification, apologies if it didn't:

>The LSB is supposed to consider both the community and the vendors. The
>vendors have a current position and its clear that the vendor position
>is v5. The glibc and g++ development world apparently prefers v6. They
>don't go away by not being "runtime implementors" or not having votes
>that count in the LSB.

Anyone who wants an LSB workgroup vote can qualify through a relatively
low threshold of participation.  That's in place only as an "educated
voter" measure, not to try to keep people out. There's no "membership"
or other barrier and you certainly don't have to be a vendor. The 
workgroup tries not to get to where votes are needed very often,
however, so this rarely even comes up.